Friday, January 27, 2006
French Parliamentarian Fined for 'Homophobic' Hate Speech
While France is not America, the agenda of homosexual advocates remain the same: eliminate all opposition to homosexuality, by force if necessary. This French politician was fined 6000 Euro's for saying, "Homosexual acts are socially and morally inferior"
Effectively, thought control has come to France in the from of a 'hate-crimes' legislation. In his defense he said, "...To describe a behavior which is not beneficial for society is not discriminating against those who make the choice of homosexuality (cite). His point is right; heterosexual sex yields the benefits of children for society--homosexual acts do not.
This hate-crimes legislation is similar to that which Washington State has passed and which the House of Representatives has passed in America. By elevating, 'sexual orientation,' to civil rights status, homosexual can now control your thoughts--in France at least.
Effectively, thought control has come to France in the from of a 'hate-crimes' legislation. In his defense he said, "...To describe a behavior which is not beneficial for society is not discriminating against those who make the choice of homosexuality (cite). His point is right; heterosexual sex yields the benefits of children for society--homosexual acts do not.
This hate-crimes legislation is similar to that which Washington State has passed and which the House of Representatives has passed in America. By elevating, 'sexual orientation,' to civil rights status, homosexual can now control your thoughts--in France at least.
Thoughtful Readers Speak:
<< Home
RIGHTFAITH: Where everything favors the stewardship of patrimony. All content is believed to be correct but may be amended based upon new information. The content of this page may be republished with proper citation without the expressed consent of the author. This site is not, in any manner whatsoever, associated with the religious philosophism from the Indian penninsula. All comments or emails to the author become the property of the author and may be published or deleted without notice or reason provided. Copyrighted 2005.
Almost no heterosexual sex yields children. On average, it takes over 500 penetrative sex acts to concieve a child. Fun fact.
Also, maybe you've heard of this little thing called "contraception"? It prevents babies.
Certainly, making kids is good. We like stable populations. But let's not pretend that straight sex, the vast vast majority of which is for pleasure and not procreation, is somehow "morally superior" to gay sex acts which are also merely for pleasure.
Also, maybe you've heard of this little thing called "contraception"? It prevents babies.
Certainly, making kids is good. We like stable populations. But let's not pretend that straight sex, the vast vast majority of which is for pleasure and not procreation, is somehow "morally superior" to gay sex acts which are also merely for pleasure.
there you go again being an idiot;
how about another fun fact: 100% of homosexual sex acts yields no children...
how about another fun fact: 100% of homosexual sex acts yields no children...
# posted by 
: 8:24 PM
: 8:24 PM
there you go again being an idiot;
Ah. Name-calling. How mature and Christian.
how about another fun fact: 100% of homosexual sex acts yields no children...
Sure. Homosexuals have children exactly the same way heterosexuals do; the union of egg and sperm inside a uterus.
I don't see the relevance, though.
Ah. Name-calling. How mature and Christian.
how about another fun fact: 100% of homosexual sex acts yields no children...
Sure. Homosexuals have children exactly the same way heterosexuals do; the union of egg and sperm inside a uterus.
I don't see the relevance, though.
I've been having heterosexual sex now for, let's see...6 years. Amazingly enough, I've never been pregnant.
franklin, thanks for your comments; no name calling--be nice.
chet, I often wonder why you and erica comment. Maybe it's you crazy version of a long-distance relationship. I don't know...maybe fun husband wife activity. Who know's.
But, I marvel at your ability to change the subject. Your quite good at it. For example, you make a statement, "Almost no heterosexual sex yields children. On average, it takes over 500 penetrative sex acts to concieve a child. Fun fact." and then later claim that the response given "how about another fun fact: 100% of homosexual sex acts yields no children..." doesn't have anything to do with anything?
Remarkable.
chet, I often wonder why you and erica comment. Maybe it's you crazy version of a long-distance relationship. I don't know...maybe fun husband wife activity. Who know's.
But, I marvel at your ability to change the subject. Your quite good at it. For example, you make a statement, "Almost no heterosexual sex yields children. On average, it takes over 500 penetrative sex acts to concieve a child. Fun fact." and then later claim that the response given "how about another fun fact: 100% of homosexual sex acts yields no children..." doesn't have anything to do with anything?
Remarkable.
chet, I often wonder why you and erica comment. Maybe it's you crazy version of a long-distance relationship.
Actually, we're right here in the same room. Nothing long-distance about it. You posted at the blog of a friend; we found your blog; and we rarely have the opportunity to engage with such charactures of the religious right. I mean, it's like somebody cookie-cut you guys out of Norman Rockwell paintings and a few episodes of Bible Stories.
But I understand how it could confuse you that someone would want to engage in debate with someone who believes something totally different than you. You are, after all, no liberal.
But, I marvel at your ability to change the subject.
I actually almost never change the subject, I merely approach it from a direction you may not be familiar with the truth. In this case, you've tried to exalt straight sex as being the source of life, whereas gay sex is not.
But the vast, vast majority of straight sex results in no life. 499 in 500 - that's about 99.8% - of straight sex acts result in nothing but pleasure, and that's counting only the sex acts done for the purpose of procreation.
The miracle of life is, indeed, something to exalt. But it's ridiculous to put straight people on some kind of vastly superior moral footing when they're only infinitesimally more likely to concieve a child through their sexual activity than a gay couple.
And the entire argument misses the point - the miracle of life, which is not merely conception but the entire gamut of parenting, is as avaliable to gay persons as to straight. Parenting is avaliable to everyone. Let's not act like one way of starting it is morally superior to any other, except in regards to what is best for the child.
Post a Comment
Actually, we're right here in the same room. Nothing long-distance about it. You posted at the blog of a friend; we found your blog; and we rarely have the opportunity to engage with such charactures of the religious right. I mean, it's like somebody cookie-cut you guys out of Norman Rockwell paintings and a few episodes of Bible Stories.
But I understand how it could confuse you that someone would want to engage in debate with someone who believes something totally different than you. You are, after all, no liberal.
But, I marvel at your ability to change the subject.
I actually almost never change the subject, I merely approach it from a direction you may not be familiar with the truth. In this case, you've tried to exalt straight sex as being the source of life, whereas gay sex is not.
But the vast, vast majority of straight sex results in no life. 499 in 500 - that's about 99.8% - of straight sex acts result in nothing but pleasure, and that's counting only the sex acts done for the purpose of procreation.
The miracle of life is, indeed, something to exalt. But it's ridiculous to put straight people on some kind of vastly superior moral footing when they're only infinitesimally more likely to concieve a child through their sexual activity than a gay couple.
And the entire argument misses the point - the miracle of life, which is not merely conception but the entire gamut of parenting, is as avaliable to gay persons as to straight. Parenting is avaliable to everyone. Let's not act like one way of starting it is morally superior to any other, except in regards to what is best for the child.
<< Home
